Provided by Clinician 1
** Please note:
The requirements for AANP re-certification are different. One other fact, for any PA providers reading – I fully understand that you must re-take your exam every sixth year, along with maintaining CE credits. So my entire blog centers around the ANCC renewal process, which is MY accrediting body.
I just completed my on-line renewal for my ANCC Family Nurse Practitioner re-certification. At the risk of the “powers that be” pulling my file for audit (yes, you can – I have NOTHING to hide, mind you...LOL), I gnash my teeth when I get my notification that renewal is looming. Being as “Type-A” as I am, I constantly log my CME hours in a notebook, complete with the paper documents that I’ve collected from online courses or the occasional day course.
This time, I completed the process online – a HUGE improvement from the paper forms from years past, IMHO. It probably would have been even easier had I kept up with entering my CME courses as I went, rather than having to enter a big “heap” of data at once...but truly, it was pretty simple. Enter your demographic data, CME courses, and in my case – my precepting hours (all 305 of them). The CME hours are automatically saved and tallied, and at the end, a credit card payment finishes the process. Voilà! Finis! No paperwork needs to be submitted, unless you are audited, and it takes about four weeks to process, instead of the usual eight weeks by paper.
Then I got to thinking about this whole certification issue. And paying $280 dollars for this “privilege,” which is a $70 DISCOUNT because I am a member of the American College of Nurse Practitioners. I wondered, what do I REALLY get from being certified? It’s a mandatory piece of paper. I cannot practice in Pennsylvania without it. I cannot get paid by Medicare and other insurances if I don’t have certification. The ANCC website states that board-certified professionals:
“meet specified requirements in order to maintain and renew your certification within five years. The purpose of certification renewal is to provide evidence that you have continued to expand your professional knowledge to demonstrate evidence of continual competence in your certification specialty. It allows you to continue use your ANCC credentials.”
Source: http://www.nursecredentialing.org/RenewCertification.aspx
On the surface, being “board-certified” shows, upon graduation, one’s minimal competence in practice. One would hope that the NP who has those B.C. initials WOULD be competent, right? However, passing our initial boards means that we are “minimally competent” to practice. Realistically, how many of us would want to study and take that darn exam AGAIN? Especially if we specialize in an area of medicine? I know VERY few NPs who would willingly re-take that exam. Even those of us in primary care don’t want to. Why? We learn the “art” of medicine...the nuances of our own practice and demographics of our patients.
I know that the questions have changed in the past ten years as well. Would we so easily pass that TEST? Probably not as easily as we would have as new graduates. And so...therein lies the alternative – obtaining CME credits.
Since I graduated in 2001, the credit hours for ANCC have increased to either a total of 150 hours of CME, OR 75 hours plus an additional component of precepting, writing a journal article, taking credits for college, etc. The CME requirements will change again by 2014; NPs and CNS clinicians will be required to have pharmaceutical hours as a significant part of their CME hours.
Continuing education is an excellent thing. We need to stay focused on evidence-based research and the latest practice protocols. Often, in our day-to-day lives, it’s too difficult to sit down at the end of the day to read yet-another journal detailing these issues. Getting away to a conference offers the chance to network, hear the research, and take those moments to focus on the pertinent aspects of protocols that we overlook in our daily “grind.” For those of us—myself included—whose family commitments are too busy, online CME is a wonderful option.
However...getting back to the “certification” part of it...Why are we paying SO MUCH for certification?
Quite frankly, it ticks me off to have to spend this amount of money for those “B.C.” initials, on top of the time and money for CME hours. Not to mention the irony of requiring this board certification for reimbursement by third parties who LOVE to reimburse us at LESS than our physician colleagues. Yes, I’m referring to that wonderful 85% payment by Medicare, or even less by some private payors when patients see a Nurse Practitioner.
Let’s stop a moment and look at these statistics:
1. In Pennsylvania, you can’t see Medicare patients unless you are board-certified.
2. You can’t be board-certified unless you completed a Masters program.
3. If you HAVE completed a Masters program AND are board-certified, you will be paid 85% of the physician reimbursement rate under current guidelines, UNLESS you bill “incident-to,” upon which those guidelines are SO strict, you might as well just forget about it, unless you want to invite a Medicare audit at some point in your career.
– example: If you see a routine HTN/DM patient after your collaborating doc, and oh-by-the-way, he mentions URI symptoms that you address: BAM: new problem, NO LONGER incident-to billing. End-of-story, see ya later. (Do you see why incident-to billing is ridiculous?) That means you will usually get that 85% fee.
So...the round-about way to look at the global issue is this:
1. I paid tons of money to get an MSN in the first place. Don’t even get me started on the DNP issue. NO time, money, or desire for THAT.
2. I pay money every 5 years to maintain board-certification AND get CME credits.
3. When I do that, I will automatically collect 15% LESS than my physician colleagues, even though I probably work harder than many do in educating/treating my patients, and my outcomes are the same or BETTER.
4. Why the heck are we paying SO MUCH for certification that isn’t getting us ANYTHING except second-class status?
OH, me, me, me!!! (waving my hands frantically) I wanna answer the question. Oh...what question?
Scroll back a few lines. WHY ARE WE PAYING SO MUCH FOR CERTIFICATION?
Is it to “feed” the nursing organization masses & replenish the kitty? Because it “looks good” to be certified? Look, I fully support the nursing groups which I belong to...with 110% of my being. My local state representative runs if he sees me in the store, because he knows I’ll accost him with some new NP issue. (smile)
IMHO, just make these fees REASONABLE. You already have our attention, guys. It’s mandatory. We get it. Perhaps you’d even get MORE people getting certified (nurses, too, not just NPs) if you decided to keep it AFFORDABLE.

Kim Spering is a family nurse practitioner who currently works at Brndjar Medical Associates, P.C., a family practice in Emmaus, PA. Her past experience includes the fields of medical/surgical ICU, open heart/trauma ICU, labor and delivery, nursing education, nursing supervision, and as a nurse practitioner in both family practice and OB/GYN settings. She currently serves as a NP preceptor for her graduate school alma mater, DeSales University, as well as for local baccalaureate programs. She is passionate about patient education and helping patients understand that they are ultimately responsible for their own health. She also firmly believes that the public needs to be educated on the value of NPs and PAs in meeting the health care needs of the next decade and beyond. In her free time, Kim enjoys family vacations with her optometrist husband, Mark, and her two sons, Matthew and Connor.
The viewpoint expressed in this article is the opinion of the author and is not necessarily the viewpoint of the owners or employees at Healthcare Staffing Innovations, LLC.
RECOMMEND THIS ARTICLE
You must be logged in to recommend articles

|
 |
 |
 |
| Kim Spering (Emmaus, PA) |
on 02 Aug 2011 at 9:20 pm |
|
Thank you for your comments.
@ TP: I agree with you. And actually, much to the dismay of many others I know, I wouldn't have a problem if our re-certification was along this line. Taking boards to show continued competence makes more sense than just paying money for a piece of paper ON TOP OF the credits we get.
@ M. Frost: I'm curious about a few of your comments. So you are saying that YOU retake the boards yourself every 5 years? Also, please check; I never said the DNP and reimbursement should be addressed first prior to certification. I only said I won't be getting or paying for a DNP.
As far as I know, no one is changing requirements for certification...yet. However, it wouldn't surprise me down the line if there isn't some guideline for mandating a DNP to be board-certified. As of now, yes, that WOULD be "putting the cart in front of the horse." But perhaps not in 10 years or more. When I graduated, not every NP needed certification to practice. Now, of course, if you want to be certified and reimbursed, you DO...at least in most states. Definitely by Medicare.
Also, reimbursement IS a big part of the picture. In the past ten years of practice, every insurance who has credentialed me NOW requires proof of certification...NOT just my copies of my license and degree. Whether we want to or not, it IS being addressed now...by third party payors.
Lastly, this certification test is given to NEW graduates...every time. This IS a test of basic entry practice. I remember being drilled both in graduate school and at my review classes that passing incurred BASIC ENTRY LEVEL knowledge...and just for kicks-and-giggles, I just dug out my review course book...on page 2, in highlighted ink, it states the same. (smile)
Again, I would be open to the idea for additional on-going certification testing within a specialty, as PAs and MD/DOs have.
It also brings to mind what certain powers that be feel about the DNP certification exam...which many, including AANP, disagree with. Why anyone would want to be tested on an exam that is co-written by medical physicians...well, that's a blog for another day.
And, yes, I agree with you on one point. Fees for re-certification for other groups IS more. However, last I checked, most doctors make a LOT more than I do. And to quote an NP friend of mine...after paying for malpractice, DEA fees, hospital credentialing fees, CME, certification costs, and dues for AANP/ACNP, it almost doesn't pay to work!
Have a wonderful day~ |
|
| M. Frost, FNP-BC (Prescott, AZ) |
on 02 Aug 2011 at 9:46 am |
|
| Your argument against board certification is flawed on several points. First and foremost the test itself needs to be retaken periodically to truly demonstrate continued copetence unlike to current method of just taking cme or ceu or ce; just as other professionals retake their boards periodically. I have reviewed way too many charts that demonstrate this basic necessity for all levels of nursing to be comfortable with anything else. Second, the DNP and reimbursement issues are important but to argue either issue must be addressed before the board certification concern is addressed is putting the cart before the horse so to speak. Third, the arguement that board certification confers endorsement of only minimal competence speaks to the need for an additional step after completion of basic preparation, not removal of the test altogether. Finally, the cost of the test is certainly less than the cost some professions incur, as is the cost of initial training, making the economic argument fail prima facia. |
|
| TP (Texas) |
on 01 Aug 2011 at 7:11 pm |
|
| I think the reason for re-testing every 6 (PA'S) to 10 (Many MD's) years and recertifiying every 2 years is necessary was to set a standard method to document competence has been acheived in the interim. This has been set in all other practice genres except one . It's something that can't be assumed by our peers, patients or mentors without some kind of test. My 30 years of tertiary care level practice does not automatically bestow competence or allow me to state I practice better medicine or surgery better than any other provider. I think it is a standard that should be mandated in order to be credentialled or offered monetary reimbursement. |
|
|
|